possible terrorist attack in Redlands, California?

Less than three weeks after the Bataclan terrorist attack in Paris, an ugly incident happened today outside Los Angeles, California, with seventeen persons dead. CNN reporting shows experts saying that more and more, it looks like a terrorist attack.

We need to walk a balanced line during these troubled times. All the rabid hatred being mouthed against Muslims and everything to do with Islam is painfully reminiscent of the anti-Japanese hysteria after Pearl Harbor. But I take hope because even after something as unprecedented and horrifying as the September 11th 2001 attack, our country did not repeat the shameful deed we committed with the internment camps.

One scatterbrained woman who is like family to me stormed out of my home after talking like Archie Bunker against Muslims. The greatest irony is that she herself is Hispanic, also a minority. Stupidity knows no color. In 1995, shortly after the bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City, many jumped the gun and took it for granted that it was Muslims. Turned out that it was an Anglo-Saxon white male named Timothy McVeigh.

A Quaker saying goes that the most important thing during a storm is a calm center. If you see anything suspicious, contact the police or the FBI. For you Canadians, that would be the RCMP. The West is currently going through a rough patch with ISIS and all the craziness in the Middle East. We need to hang together, operate through our police and democratic institutions, and respect the Constitution.

 

Obama said the mass shooting at San Bernardino, California may be related to terrorism. The shooters returned from Saudi Arabia recently.

 

We are trapped in the crossfire, the Americans bombing everywhere they can, and that is not terrorism? is it that We only see the harm to Ourselves? Or We can't see that this situation of unrest is provoked by Our attacks on other people's culture, religion and daily life?
I am going to illustrate this context with Charlie Hebdo, this "freedom of speech magazine insulted the prophet of the muslims, (this is like going to the hell angels den and tell them they are shit) would You do that?
Furthermore, American interest for oil is dragging this world in to chaos, the stupidity of those involved in to mutual attacks only harm innocent people, the real mercenaries are the oil companies in an enterprise that carries crimes far away from public view so You can be manipulated to believe what they say. this attacks for oil are called "American Interests in the Region"

to find a balance that can bring peace, United States of America needs a Regime Change. Enough is enough, And Canada should lead the world to a new Status Quo of peace and good relationship with every culture and country, respecting boundaries and natural resources, NOT stealing and demonizing to justify a crime like Americans do.
Ignore the American hysteric bullys and give way to reason and respect.

 

The only way to end terrorism is to destroy the social fabric of Muslim countries. And the way to do that is to create guerilla armies of Muslim women, armed and supplied by the USA, the UK and maybe France. These ladies would create a civil war and set up feminist governments after destroying the jihadis and their orthodox supporters. An international war in the interests of terrorism must be converted into a civil war in the interests of women's liberation.

 

This proves My point about the agenda of USA and the U.K. supported by the local psycho which in turn now wants an ethnic cleansing, killing all Muslims. You need help by a professional, seriously.
How about stopping all attacks and just leave them alone with their land and culture, what You want to do is genocide, You are no better than those terrorist, what You are saying is ludicrous, You want to unleash the killing of more people around the world, is that what gentile Zionist terrorist do? Just behind the curtain huh?

 

I do not want any more than killing than war or revolution sadly requires. Life is life. But those countries are fomenting terrorism and exporting it to the West. When we fight back, leftists and jihadists accuse America of being imperialists, of being after their oil. I stand by my words. The social fabric of those countries needs to be ripped up.

 

I am so sorry Vivek, I see My mistake now, and I apologize, I didn't notice that Your there born with a mental deficiency. (Idiot)
I don't want to cause You any frustration and be blamed for making You poop in Your Kippah making You to say Chutzpah all the time.

 

The fight between Jewish extremists and Islamic Extremists is dragging the whole world to a conflict in which only innocent People is the victim of a war in which USA, Uk and Israel promote violence in this regions of the Middle East, to get a reaction that is called "terrorist" I agree with You and Yes War is the most horrifying way to terrorize
I say leave them alone and mind Our own business!

 

For the very first time, Joking, you post something I agree with. Muslim extremists and Jewish extremists, I couldn't have put it better. In the 1950's and 1960's Israel was run by progressive, secular democratic socialist Jews. They left their Arab citizens alone so long as Arab Israelis did not make trouble. But starting in the mid-1970's right-wing, religious Jews began taking over in Israel. These started developing bullshit interpretations of ancient Hebrew scripture to justify those provocative settlements in the West Bank.

The sensible policy should be that areas with Jewish majorities are Israel, whereas areas mainly Arab are whatever else. Zionist pioneers didn't murder the locals and take their land as white settlers did with Australian aborigines or American Indians. They purchased the land. But in the Occupied Territories it is tantamount to usurpation and colonization. Both Muslim nutjobs and Jewish nutjobs have made that region a tinderbox.

 

Muslim has been living on the earth for centuries old, they never be a problem until US started wars in middle east.

Chinese has been nice for ages, if provoked by racism west, they could be unfriendly too.

You want other people treat you well, you need to treat other people well, it's as simple as that. this world is not the old world which only west has money & weapon, and they can take advantage of that to bully other nations. the world has changed, the use-to-be weak nations has become strong nations, the west should realize that.

 

People have a right to their own opinions, but not to their own false facts. So Muslims were minding their own business before Big Bad White Man stepped in? That is an outright lie. For hundreds of years, Muslim invaders or oppressors in India did the same things to my Hindu ancestors that the Ku Klux Klan did to black lynching victims. Arab slave catchers used to raid the coastlines of European countries for slaves for centuries.

In fact, you know what? the total number of white slaves taken to Arab countries was even greater than the total number of Africans taken across the Atlantic! Madame, don't make it look as if the West was unique in such crimes.

 

this is definitely a lie. Even the white people wouldn't tell such a lie.

 

NOT so fast Mimic Gallykaka:
Jews never paid for the land in Palestine, Jews invaded with weapons provided by England's Winston Crookchill, Israel never existed before 1948, since the beginning in the region they been attacking the neighbouring Countries with stupid pretextes causing an ethnic cleansing to advance and get more land for the Squatters of Europe, homeless not wanted there,
Here You have You liar!
READ!
UN resolutions against Israel


UN resolutions against Israel
We often hear from politicians and in the news talk about reasons why we should go to war against Iran and previously Iraq because they have broken a UN resolution or are not complying with the wishes of weapon inspection teams.

Our leaders often like to take the moral high ground when talking about human rights and how the wishes of the international community must be adhered to when the UN makes a decision.

They use the force of the UN and the security council when they require moral legitimacy to go to war yet they are prepared to ignore or circumvent it when votes don’t go their way.

When the west uses the UN to deal with issues surrounding the Middle Eastthey are perfectly prepared to issue resolutions that legitimise the death of millions of children through starvation as they did during the sanctions regime imposed on Iraq.

They are also perfectly willing to use the UN to legitimise pre-emptive wars,and as they are now doing with Iran, impose sanctions for it’s pursuit of nuclear energy because they suspect it “might” be planning a weapons programme despite the say so of nuclear weapons inspectors.

However there is one country in the Middle East that does have nuclear weapons and this same country has been occupying parts of Palestine in breach of UN resolutions for half a century. This country is Israel.

In fact Israel has broken more UN resolutions that any other in UN history
This country also has the benefit that their biggest ally, the USA, will veto any serious resolution against them preventing any action from being carried out.

Does this seem right or fair?

Was the UN designed only to be a tool to be used by the powerful to legitimise it’s actions?

Was it supposed to be purely a talking shop to be ignored at will no matter how deserving a resolution may seem, purely because powerful lobby groups such as AIPAC have control over most of the US congress?

Lets all remember that the beginnings of international law rose from the ashes of the 2nd World War and the Nuremberg trials. Trials in which the persecutors of the Jews were tried and sentenced.

Therefore the first attempts at creating international law were for the benefit of the Jewish people. Laws which should be applied equally to all nations is currently ignored by many.

Israel due to their powerful ally in the security council has escaped judgment more than most and whether you like some of the other despotic nations that fill the world or not it is a plain fact that Israel leads this table of broken UN resolutions.

US Vetoes of Resolutions Against Israel, 1972-2011.

1. “…condemned Israel‘s attack against Southern against southern Lebanonand Syria…”
2. “…affirmed the rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination, statehood and equal protections…”
3. “…condemned Israel‘s air strikes and attacks in southern Lebanon and its murder of innocent civilians…”
4. “…called for self-determination of Palestinian people…”
5. “…deplored Israel‘s altering of the status of Jerusalem, which is recognized as an international city by most world nations and the United Nations…”
6. “…affirmed the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people…”
7. “…endorsed self-determination for the Palestinian people…”
8. “…demanded Israel‘s withdrawal from the Golan Heights…”
9. “…condemned Israel‘s mistreatment of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip and its refusal to abide by the Geneva convention protocols of civilized nations…”
10. “…condemned an Israeli soldier who shot eleven Moslem worshippers at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount near Al-Aqsa Mosque in the Old City of Jerusalem…”
11. “…urged sanctions against Israel if it did not withdraw from its invasion of Lebanon…”
12. “…urged sanctions against Israel if it did not withdraw from its invasion of Beirut…”
13. “…urged cutoff of economic aid to Israel if it refused to withdraw from its occupation of Lebanon…”
14. “…condemned continued Israeli settlements in occupied territories in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, denouncing them as an obstacle to peace…”
15. “…deplores Israel‘s brutal massacre of Arabs in Lebanon and urges its withdrawal…”
16. “…condemned Israeli brutality in southern Lebanon and denounced the Israeli ‘Iron Fist’ policy of repression…”
17. “…denounced Israel‘s violation of human rights in the occupied territories…”
18. “…deplored Israel‘s violence in southern Lebanon…”
19. “…deplored Israel‘s activities in occupied Arab East Jerusalem that threatened the sanctity of Muslim holy sites…”
20. “…condemned Israel‘s hijacking of a Libyan passenger airplane…”
21. “…deplored Israel‘s attacks against Lebanon and its measures and practices against the civilian population of Lebanon…”
22. “…called on Israel to abandon its policies against the Palestinian intifada that violated the rights of occupied Palestinians, to abide by the Fourth Geneva Conventions, and to formalize a leading role for the United Nations in future peace negotiations…”
23. “…urged Israel to accept back deported Palestinians, condemned Israel‘s shooting of civilians, called on Israel to uphold the Fourth Geneva Convention, and called for a peace settlement under UN auspices…”
24. “…condemned Israel‘s… incursion into Lebanon…”
25. “…deplored Israel‘s… commando raids on Lebanon…”
26. “…deplored Israel‘s repression of the Palestinian intifada and called on Israel to respect the human rights of the Palestinians…”
27. “…deplored Israel‘s violation of the human rights of the Palestinians…”
28. “…demanded that Israel return property confiscated from Palestinians during a tax protest and allow a fact-finding mission to observe Israel‘s crackdown on the Palestinian intifada…”
29. “…called for a fact-finding mission on abuses against Palestinians in Israeli-occupied lands…”
30. “…confirmed that the expropriation of land by Israel, the occupying power, in East Jerusalem was invalid, and called upon the Government of Israel to rescind the expropriation orders and refrain from such action in the future.”
31. “…called on Israel to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the 1949 Geneva Convention” and to refrain from it’s policy of settlement expansion which “alter facts on the ground pre-empting final status negotiations, and have negative implications for the Middle EastPeace Process;”
32. “…demanded that Israel immediately cease construction of the Jabal Abu Ghneim settlement in East Jerusalem as well as other Israeli settlement activities in the occupied territories.”
33. “… requested an unarmed UN Observer force to be sent to the West Bank to help protect Palestinian civilians.”
34. “…requested the sending of a human rights monitoring force to the Occupied Territories and condemned all acts of terror, extra-judiciary killing, excessive use of force and house demolitions. Also expressed it determination to contribute to ending the violence and to prompting dialogue between Israeli and Palestinian sides.
35. “…condemned the killing by the Israeli occupying forces of
    several UN employees” and demanded that Israel, complied fully with the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War” and “refrained from the excessive and disproportionate use of force in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;”
36. “…demanded that Israel ceased threats to deport or harm Yasser Arafat, the elected President of the Palestinian Authority;”
37. “…decides that the construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a wall in the Occupied Territories departing from the armistice line of 1949 is illegal under relevant provisions of international law and must be ceased and reversed;”
38. “…condemned Israel for the extra-judicial executions that killed Sheikh Ahmed Yassin along with six other Palestinians outside a mosque in Gaza City and calls for a complete cessation of extra-judicial executions by Israel“
39. “…condemned the military incursion into Gaza and demanded the immediate cessation of all military operations in the area of Northern Gaza and the withdrawal of the Israeli occupying forces from that area;
40. “…condemned all acts of violence, terror and destruction during the Gaza conflict including rocket attacks by Hamas into Israel and the military assault being carried out by Israel.”
41. “…called upon the Palestinian Authority to take immediate and sustained action to bring an end to violence, including the firing of rockets on Israeli territory. Called upon Israel to immediately cease its military operations within Gaza and to immediately withdraw its forces to to positions prior to 28 June 2006, and expressed grave concern about the dire humanitarian situation of the Palestinian people.”
42. declared Israeli settlements in Palestinian territories were illegal and a “major obstacle to the achievement of a just, lasting and comprehensive peace”.

 

Jokey baby, your long-winded post proves naught, because the United Nations is nothing but a glorified fish market. They can issue all the statements they want. The United States ought to toss that chimpanzees' tea party to the bottom of the ocean.

 

Ever wonder why so many Arabs look practically European? Descendants of slaves who converted to Islam and intermarried with older Arabs.

 

Jokey, how could I wear a kippah when I am not even Jewish? My ancestral roots are Hindu, but I myself am a Hindon't. Or a Hin-do-not. Moreover, if I did poop it would not be in a kipah. Guess whom I would poop on?

 

You will poop on your kipah and yes you are Jew, since your know that a kipah is Jewish, you know your mental condition comes as a consequence of prostitution in your ancestry so many STD,s...
That is what makes you a liar and a cheat, you know stealing land, spreading malicious rumours about other Countires, I think igor was right about who You are, He said that You are the illegitimate son of Golda Meir and a donkey, at the beginning I said noo poor donkey what a horrible experience for that poor animal, so finally You came to this world with Your brain damaged and unexpected when You mom was pooping You where born in the toilet. So in Your moments of depressions You poop on your kipah and after that you lie but no any lie you say a Chutzpah!